Civil Wars or Planned Resource Extraction?

Slow, subtle changes have always been the oppressors weapon of choice. Instigating social engineering requires a particular strategy; too little and change may not take place, too much and you risk blowing your cover entirely.

Political events over the last few years help the onlooker to follow, and anticipate, what their next moves may be. 

For example, the war in Iran has helped make everyone look away from the genocide in Palestine, whilst Israel continue to move markers and onward with its despotic desire to 'own' the entire planet. And the United States, comprehensive world leaders in waging war on everyone else whilst blaming the people they are invading, also want to place certain people in certain places relatively unheeded.

Assets like Link 16, a secure NATO tactical data link that provides jam-resistant, encrypted communications between military aircraft, ships, ground forces can be compromised. Its terminals use Type 1 cryptographic devices that can be loaded with classified key material, which is, of course, secure - until its superceeded or compromised in some way, like every technology eventually is. 

Getting in is key, eavesdropping is then relatively easy.

According to a 'source', who invited themselves to the party, heard 'some things'.

Vindictiveness seems to be clear, including a general contempt of human life, human atrocities being guised as 'war casualties', and premeditated corruption strategies also being hidden amongst the war 'game'. Chatty!

Smokescreens. Always.

Unfortunately for the rest of us, the plan is not freedom regardless of what mainstream media says. Unless, of course, that means freedom to steal and kill unheeded if you are on a certain side.

Moving markers in Gaza is little more than childs play compared to the lastest plans, according to the intelligence organisations involved, from recent interecepted communications.

The Middle East is just a small part of the strategy. Take a look anywhere on the planet where there are resources, and expect an invasion.

Countries that have substantial natural resources and are currently experiencing an internal armed conflict commonly described as a civil war, here are five prominent examples:

Sudan & South Sudan

Major resources: Gold, oil (historically), gum arabic, chromium, livestock, fertile agricultural land.

How long has it lasted?

As of July 2026, the war has been ongoing for more than three years. It has become one of the world's largest humanitarian crises, with tens of thousands of deaths and millions of people displaced.

Myanmar

Major resources: Natural gas, jade, rubies, timber, rare earth elements, tin.

How long has it lasted?

The current nationwide civil war began after the military coup on 1 February 2021,

Yemen

Major resources: Oil, natural gas, fisheries, minerals.

How long has it lasted?

The current Yemeni civil war began in 2014.

Democratic Republic of the Congo

Major resources: Cobalt, copper, coltan, diamonds, gold, lithium, tin.

How long has it lasted?

The current major escalation began in late 2021, when the M23 group resumed its offensive.

These countries are notable both for their significant natural-resource endowments and for ongoing internal conflicts. And almost all of these wars, apart for Yemen, has happened in the last 20 years. Yemen, like Palestine and Iran, has been used as a political football for decades.

Countries which only have large resources because they haven't been exploited for centuries.

People and communities are generally happy and stable when they have ample resources. Yet all these countries now have large internal armed conflicts going on. 

Coincidence?

Not to mention they need to get their weapon supply from somewhere too..