Skip to main content

The SKAdNetwork



SKAdNetwork (StoreKit Ad Network) is Apple’s system for measuring ad performance on iOS in a privacy-preserving way—introduced as part of the shift away from user-level tracking after App Tracking Transparency.

It’s basically Apple’s answer to:

“How do advertisers know an ad worked without tracking the person who saw it?”



1) The core idea

Instead of telling advertisers:

“User X saw ad Y and installed app Z”


SKAdNetwork only tells them:

“An install happened, attributed to ad campaign Y”


…but:

• no personal identity

• no device ID (like IDFA)

• no cross-app tracking data


So it’s aggregated, delayed, and anonymised attribution.



2) How it works (step-by-step)


Step 1: Ad impression / click

A user sees or clicks an ad inside an app on iOS.

The ad network registers:

• campaign ID

• ad network ID

• basic metadata

But not the user identity.


Step 2: App install happens

If the user installs the advertised app within a time window, iOS records:

“This install is associated with campaign X”


But again:

no user-level data is shared


Step 3: Apple signs the attribution

iOS generates a signed postback (a cryptographically verified message).

This is sent to the ad network with:

• campaign ID

• conversion value (limited info)

• coarse timing (delayed)

No device identifiers included.


Step 4: Delayed reporting

Reports are intentionally delayed (often hours to days) and sometimes randomised.


This prevents:

real-time tracking of individual behaviour

correlation of events back to a specific person


3) What advertisers actually get

They receive:

• number of installs per campaign

• limited conversion signals (e.g. whether user opened app, made purchase category-level signals)

• rough timing buckets


They do NOT get:

IP address

device ID (IDFA)

precise user journey

cross-app identity


4) What “conversion value” means

SKAdNetwork allows a small encoded number called a conversion value.


Apps can use it to signal things like:

• user opened app

• completed onboarding

• made a purchase tier (very limited encoding space)


But:

• it’s heavily compressed

• not user-specific

• not real-time


5) What SKAdNetwork breaks

It removes or weakens:


❌ User-level attribution

No more “this specific user clicked ad and bought product”


❌ Cross-app tracking

No linking behaviour across multiple apps


❌ Real-time feedback loops

Advertisers can’t instantly optimise based on live user behaviour



6) What still works (important)

Even with SKAdNetwork:

✔ Campaign-level optimisation

Advertisers can still see:

which ads perform better overall


✔ Aggregate performance tracking

installs per campaign

rough ROI estimation


✔ Model-based inference

Companies like Google and Meta Platforms use:

statistical modelling

cohort analysis

machine learning prediction

..to fill in the gaps.


7) Why it’s controversial in ad tech

Advertisers dislike SKAdNetwork because it:

• removes user-level visibility

• reduces precision targeting

• slows feedback loops

• makes optimisation harder


Privacy advocates like it because it:

• prevents surveillance-style tracking

• reduces identity leakage

• enforces aggregation


8) The big tradeoff

SKAdNetwork is built on a simple principle:

“Advertisers can know what worked, but not who you are or what you did specifically.”


So it shifts advertising from:

individual tracking → aggregate measurement



Summary

SKAdNetwork is Apple’s privacy-preserving system that lets advertisers measure campaign performance on iOS without exposing user identity or enabling cross-app tracking.



How advertisers “hack around” its limits using modelling and server-side signals


Okay, so they don’t “hack” SKAdNetwork in the illegal sense—what they do is reconstruct missing detail using statistical modelling, server-side data, and correlation tricks. The effect is that they recover some of the lost signal from SKAdNetwork and App Tracking Transparency, but only probabilistically.


Here’s how that actually works.



1) The big shift: from user data → prediction

After iOS privacy changes, advertisers lost:

• device IDs (IDFA)

• direct user-level attribution

• real-time conversion feedback


So they switched to:

“We don’t observe the user—we infer what likely happened based on patterns.”


This is called probabilistic attribution modelling.



2) Conversion modelling (filling in SKAdNetwork gaps)

SKAdNetwork only gives:

• campaign-level installs

• delayed, aggregated signals

• limited “conversion values”


So advertisers build models that guess missing detail.


How it works:

They train models using:

• historical pre-ATT data (when tracking was richer)

• current SKAdNetwork aggregates

• known campaign performance patterns


Then they predict:

• which users likely converted early vs late

• which campaigns likely drove high-value users

• expected lifetime value (LTV) distributions


So instead of:

“User X bought item Y”


They get:

“This campaign likely produces high-value users at a rate of ~Z%”



3) Server-side tracking (the biggest workaround)

Instead of relying on the phone to send data, companies move logic to servers.


Example flow:

User clicks ad in an app

They land on a website or app backend


The server logs:

• click timestamp

• campaign ID

• session behaviour

• purchase or signup happens on server


Server tries to match events using:

timing correlation

campaign parameters

probabilistic identifiers


This is called server-side event tracking.


It avoids iOS restrictions because:

• data is collected by the advertiser’s server, not the device OS



4) “Click-through reconstruction” (timing correlation)

Even without user IDs, advertisers exploit timing patterns:


If:

Ad click happens at 10:01

App install occurs at 10:03

Purchase occurs at 10:08


They infer:

• likely same user journey


SKAdNetwork intentionally introduces delays and noise to reduce this, but modelling still extracts trends.



5) Fingerprint-assisted probabilistic linking (limited but still used)

Even though Apple restricts fingerprinting, some weak signals remain:

• IP region consistency (not exact identity)

• device model distributions (e.g. iPhone 14 users behave differently than iPhone SE users)

• app version + OS version combinations

• session timing patterns


These are used not to identify individuals, but to improve:

“Which cluster of users likely converted?”



6) Cohort and aggregate inference (very important)

Instead of tracking individuals, advertisers build cohorts:


Example:

“Users acquired from TikTok ads in UK, iOS 17, last 7 days”


Then they measure:

• install rate

• retention

• revenue distribution


They compare cohorts across campaigns to optimise spending.


This works even with SKAdNetwork because:

SKAdNetwork still provides aggregate outputs per campaign



7) “Conversion value mapping” tricks

Apps encode behaviour into SKAdNetwork’s limited conversion value field.


Example encoding:

0 = installed only

1 = opened app

2 = completed onboarding

3 = added to cart

4 = purchased


Advertisers then:

• decode patterns across campaigns

• estimate funnel drop-off rates

• reconstruct partial user journeys statistically


It’s lossy, but still useful at scale.



8) Machine learning reconstruction (the real engine)

Big platforms like Google and Meta Platforms use ML models that:

• ingest SKAdNetwork aggregates

• combine with historical user-level datasets (pre-ATT)

• simulate likely user journeys

• adjust predictions in real time


The result is:

synthetic reconstruction of user behaviour patterns


Not exact tracking—but very effective forecasting.



Identity stitching still happens (just differently)

Even with ATT, identity resolution still exists via:


A) Logged-in accounts

Facebook / Instagram / Google accounts remain strongest identifiers


B) First-party data

websites collect emails, purchases, phone numbers

then upload hashed identifiers to ad platforms


C) Offline-to-online matching

loyalty programs

email signups

purchase receipts


These become anchors that reconnect probabilistic data.



The key limitation (important reality check)

All of this “workaround” tracking:

• is less precise than old IDFA-based tracking

• introduces uncertainty

• works best in large-scale aggregate systems, not individual certainty


So the system shifts from:

“we know exactly who did what”

to:

“we’re highly confident this type of user did this thing”



Summary

After SKAdNetwork and App Tracking Transparency, advertisers didn’t stop tracking—they switched to:

server-side event collection + probabilistic modelling + cohort analysis to reconstruct user behaviour indirectly rather than directly.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Learjet 60 Accident: Palm Beach, Florida

A Learjet 60 crashed in Palm Beach County, Florida, on Sunday 1 November 2026, sadly killing all nine people aboard.  The circumstances are particularly disturbing, as preliminary information suggests the aircraft experienced serious difficulties shortly before plunging almost vertically towards the ground. There is a historical pattern of Learjet aircraft experiencing unexpected loss of control at high altitude, followed by extremely rapid descents. What happened? Date: 1 November 2026. Aircraft: Learjet 60, registration N722BD. Location: Near Cresthaven, Greenacres, Palm Beach County, Florida. People aboard: Nine – all died. Departure: Austin-Bergstrom International Airport, Texas. Destination: North Eleuthera Airport, Bahamas. Crash time: Approximately 12:50pm local time. The aircraft crashed close to Military Trail and 10th Avenue North, erupting into a huge fireball. It narrowly missed nearby homes and passing vehicles. The final moments – what went wrong? This is perhaps the...

The Tamang People of Nepal — History, Culture and a Community Living Through Disaster

The Tamang are an indigenous people of the Himalayan hills. Among Nepal's many ethnic communities, the Tamang occupy a distinctive place in the country's history and cultural landscape. Numbering approximately 1.64 million people according to Nepal's 2021 census, the Tamang are one of the country's largest Indigenous groups.  Around three-quarters live in what is now Bagmati Province, particularly in the hill and mountain districts surrounding Kathmandu.  Their traditional homeland encompasses areas including Rasuwa, Nuwakot, Dhading, Makwanpur, Kavrepalanchok, Sindhupalchok and neighbouring districts. Their communities are particularly associated with the Himalayan foothills and highlands north of Kathmandu — precisely the mountainous region that has repeatedly been exposed to earthquakes, landslides, floods and other natural hazards. Yet the Tamang are far more than a geographical population. They possess their own language, religious traditions, social institutions, ...

Starlizard: The Secretive Betting Machine Built on Data

There are bookmakers that advertise on television, betting apps that sit on millions of smartphones and casinos that spend billions trying to attract customers. Then there is Starlizard. The London-based company operates largely away from public view. Its business is built around something considerably less glamorous than advertising: enormous quantities of sporting data, statistical modelling, probability and the ability to act on tiny discrepancies in betting markets. At its centre is billionaire businessman and professional gambler Tony Bloom, the owner of Brighton & Hove Albion. Starlizard has become one of the most interesting examples of what happens when gambling is treated less like a game of chance and more like quantitative finance. And recent High Court proceedings have provided an unusually detailed glimpse inside an organisation that has historically been extremely reluctant to reveal how it operates. Who is Starlizard? Starlizard was established in 2006 and is based i...

Science in 1926: What We Knew, What We Got Wrong, and What Comes Next

From the birth of television to the foundations of quantum physics, 1926 was a year that helped shape the modern world.  But a century ago, scientific confidence often exceeded scientific understanding. What will future generations think of the science we believe in today? A Century Between Two Worlds Imagine travelling back to 1926 and telling a scientist that, within a century, humans would walk on the Moon, transplant organs, edit DNA, communicate instantly across the planet and carry devices with more computing power than entire rooms of machinery. They might believe some of it. Much of it would sound like science fiction. Now imagine travelling in the opposite direction. A scientist from 2126 arrives today and examines our hospitals, laboratories, computers and scientific textbooks.  What would astonish them? What would they admire? And which of our most confidently held beliefs would make them smile in disbelief? The year 1926 offers an unusually revealing starting point...

The Lake That Can Turn Animals to Stone — What Really Happens at Lake Natron?

In northern Tanzania, near the border with Kenya, lies a lake with an almost otherworldly reputation. Its waters can appear red, orange or pink, temperatures can become extreme, and its chemistry is hostile to most forms of life. Yet Lake Natron is not a dead lake. It is one of the most unusual ecosystems on Earth — and the apparent contradiction at its heart is what makes it so fascinating.  The same conditions that can preserve the remains of animals also create an environment where millions of flamingos can breed. Photographs of apparently petrified birds have helped create the legend that Lake Natron literally turns animals to stone. The reality is stranger, but considerably more scientific. A Lake in the Rift Valley Lake Natron sits in Tanzania's Gregory Rift, part of the enormous East African Rift system. It is a closed basin, meaning water enters the lake but does not flow out to the sea or into another major river system. Instead, water is lost primarily through evaporation...

UK Weapon Manufacturers

Major UK weapons manufacturers (prime contractors) These are the companies that design and build complete weapons systems: • BAE Systems – by far the UK’s largest defence company (warships, submarines, aircraft, munitions) • Babcock International – naval support, submarines, military infrastructure • Rolls-Royce Holdings – nuclear submarine reactors, military jet engines • MBDA – missiles (joint UK/France/Italy company, major UK presence) • Leonardo UK – radar, sensors, helicopters • Thales - surveillance systems used by armed forces around the world 👉 There are roughly 5–10 major “prime” weapons manufacturers in the UK. The wider defence industry Beyond the primes, the picture gets much bigger. Thousands of companies supply: • Components (electronics, metals, software) • Subsystems (guidance, propulsion) • Maintenance and support According to UK defence industry data: • Around 12,000+ companies are involved in the UK defence supply chain • Only a fraction of these actually manufactur...

The Town Beneath the Water — The Lost Streets of Derwent, England

For most of the year, there is little evidence that a village once stood beneath the waters of Ladybower Reservoir. The reservoir occupies a broad valley in the Peak District of Derbyshire. Its waters provide drinking water for communities across the East Midlands, while the surrounding landscape has become one of the most recognisable parts of the Peak District. But beneath the surface lies a different landscape. There were once houses here. There was a church. There was a school. There were farms, roads, trees and a community that had existed for generations. The villages of Derwent and Ashopton were deliberately abandoned in the 1940s before the valleys were flooded to create the Ladybower Reservoir. Today, most of that landscape is hidden. Occasionally, however, falling water levels reveal fragments of what was lost. And when they do, thousands of people are reminded that the reservoir isn't simply a landscape feature. It is also a submerged piece of Derbyshire history. Two Vil...

Where Is Elon Musk’s Tesla Roadster Now? The Strange Journey of Starman Through the Solar System

On 6 February 2018, Elon Musk did something that sounded like a joke but was entirely real. During the first demonstration flight of SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy, instead of launching a conventional dummy payload, Musk placed his own midnight-cherry Tesla Roadster on top of the rocket. Behind the wheel sat a mannequin wearing a spacesuit. Its name was Starman. More than eight years later, the car is still travelling through space. It is not parked in orbit around Earth. It is not orbiting Mars. And despite the popular images of the car apparently heading towards the Red Planet, Mars was never its actual destination. The Tesla is now an artificial object in heliocentric orbit — orbiting the Sun. And as of August 2026, it is continuing its enormous looping journey through the inner Solar System. Where Is the Tesla Roadster Right Now? The latest available orbital tracking data puts the Roadster roughly 102 million kilometres from Earth and about 244 million kilometres from the Sun.  That pla...

The Tollund Man: What Happened to the Man Who Was Hanged 2,400 Years Ago?

In 1950, two brothers cutting peat in a bog near Silkeborg, Denmark, made an extraordinary discovery. At first, they believed they had found the body of someone recently murdered. The man's face was remarkably well preserved. His eyes were closed, his expression peaceful, and around his neck was a leather cord. But this was no modern crime scene. The body was more than 2,000 years old. Known today as the Tollund Man, he is one of the best-preserved human remains ever discovered from prehistoric Europe.  His body survived because of an unusual combination of acidic water, low oxygen and the chemical conditions found inside peat bogs. Yet preservation is only part of the mystery. The question that has fascinated archaeologists for decades is much darker: Why was he killed and placed in the bog? A man frozen in time Tollund Man probably lived during the 4th century BCE, during Europe's Iron Age. When discovered, much of his body was still astonishingly intact. His face retained re...

Point Nemo: The Most Isolated Place on Earth

Imagine standing in the middle of the ocean. There is no island on the horizon. No coastline. No lighthouse. No passing fishing boat. In every direction, land is thousands of kilometres away.  You are closer to the emptiness of the Pacific than to almost anywhere inhabited by humans. This place exists. It is known as Point Nemo — the oceanic pole of inaccessibility — and it lies in the remote South Pacific Ocean. But Point Nemo is more than simply a dot on a map. It is one of the strangest geographical locations on Earth, a place where isolation becomes almost absolute. And, remarkably, it has also become associated with something rather unusual: the final resting place of spacecraft. Where exactly is Point Nemo? Point Nemo lies at approximately 48°52.6′S, 123°23.6′W. According to NOAA, the nearest land is roughly 2,688 kilometres away. Three pieces of land are approximately equally distant: Ducie Island in the Pitcairn Islands, Motu Nui near Easter Island, and Maher Island off Ant...