Palantir in bed with the NHS

Is Palantir using war to train AI systems for the NHS?

A shocking revelation has come to light regarding the NHS and defence firm Palantir.

The idea that Palantir is “using war to train AI systems for the NHS” has come from a mix of real facts and legitimate ethical concerns.

Here’s a clear breakdown.

1) What Palantir actually does (in both war and healthcare)

Palantir is a US tech company that builds data analysis and AI platforms used in very different contexts:

• Military / war use

Works with the Pentagon and allies on systems like Project Maven

These tools:

• Analyse satellite/drone data

• Help identify targets

• Speed up military decision-making

Some demos even show AI helping plan attacks or interpret battlefield data.

👉 So yes — Palantir does build AI used in warfare

In the UK, Palantir also runs the Federated Data Platform (FDP)

This system:

• Connects hospital data (waiting lists, beds, staff, etc.)

• Helps with scheduling, logistics, and planning care

👉 FDP is mainly about health system efficiency, rather than clinical AI or weapons

2) Where the “training AI with war data” idea comes from

This claim is more about concern than evidence. It usually comes from three points:

A. Same company, different domains

Palantir builds AI for:

• military intelligence

• policing & surveillance

• healthcare

Critics worry:

If the same company builds all these systems, knowledge or techniques could transfer between them.

That’s plausible at a technical level (shared tools, methods), but there’s no concrete evidence that:

NHS data is used to train military AI

or that military data is used to train NHS systems

B. Data-sharing fears (key controversy)

Some groups argue:

• NHS data is extremely valuable (huge population, long history)

• Once data enters complex AI systems, it’s hard to guarantee it isn’t reused

Even though:

NHS England says Palantir is not allowed to train AI on NHS data, Palantir says it does use client data to train its models.

👉 The concern is also about future misuse or lack of transparency.

C. Ethical objections (big driver of the narrative)

Many NHS staff and groups object because Palantir has worked with:

• US military

• immigration enforcement (ICE)

• It develops tools linked to surveillance and warfare

This leads to arguments like:

“Using their software supports a war-linked company”

“Healthcare data shouldn’t be handled by firms tied to military AI”

These concerns are widely reported among NHS staff and unions

3) What is NOT happening (based on evidence)

So far there is no credible evidence that:

❌ NHS patient data is being used to train battlefield AI

❌ War data is directly used to treat NHS patients

❌ The NHS system is a military AI system

4) What is a fair concern vs what isn’t

Legitimate concerns

Data privacy and control

Dependence on a private US tech firm

Ethical issues around Palantir’s other clients

Transparency of AI systems

Less accurate claims

“They are training NHS AI using war data” → ❌ no evidence

“Your medical data is being used to run wars” → ❌ not supported

Core argument: healthcare should not be built on military-industrial infrastructure

Healthcare exists to preserve life impartially.

Military companies are structurally designed for strategic advantage, intelligence gathering, and conflict outcomes.

Combining the two creates unavoidable conflicts of interest that risk distorting healthcare priorities, data use, and public trust.

1) Fundamental mission conflict

Healthcare mission:

• Treat patients equally

• Maximise wellbeing

• Minimise harm

• Maintain trust and confidentiality

Military/defence mission:

• Gain strategic advantage

• Identify threats

• Operate in adversarial environments

• Prioritise national security objectives

Argument:

Even if a company works on both, these missions are not fully compatible. Healthcare data systems built by defence contractors risk inheriting a logic of surveillance and control rather than care and confidentiality.

2) Risk of function creep (gradual misuse)

A key concern is function creep: systems built for one purpose slowly expand into others.

Example risks; health data systems later used for:

• population monitoring

• predictive policing

• security screening

• “Emergency use” justification expanding over time

Argument:

Once infrastructure exists, it is difficult to strictly enforce boundaries between healthcare use and security use, especially when the provider’s core expertise is intelligence and defence.

3) Data trust and patient confidence

Healthcare depends on absolute trust that:

• sensitive data stays within medical contexts

• it is not repurposed for non-medical surveillance

If patients believe their data is connected to military-linked firms:

• they may withhold information

• they may avoid care

• public trust in health institutions erodes

Argument:

Even perceived association with defence intelligence can damage the psychological contract between patients and healthcare systems.

4) Concentration of power and opacity

Military tech companies often:

• operate with high levels of secrecy

• work on classified contracts

• resist full public disclosure

Healthcare systems require:

• transparency

• clinical accountability

• public scrutiny

Argument:

When critical healthcare infrastructure is built by firms used to secrecy, democratic oversight becomes harder, weakening accountability.

5) Normalisation of surveillance infrastructure

Military AI systems are often designed for:

• detection

• tracking

• prediction of “threats”

In healthcare, similar tools can become:

• risk scoring systems

• predictive profiling of patients

• automated prioritisation of care

Argument:

This can shift healthcare from universal care to risk-managed population control, especially if models prioritise efficiency over equity.

6) Ethical spillover and reputational legitimacy

Working with healthcare can:

• legitimise military companies in civilian life

• blur public understanding of surveillance technologies

• make defence contractors appear “neutral infrastructure providers”

Argument:

This risks normalising companies whose primary expertise is defence and intelligence into spaces that should remain strictly civilian and humanitarian.

7) Alternative is possible (so trade-off is not necessary)

A strong argument must address inevitability. Healthcare systems can instead use:

• public-sector tech development

• open-source platforms

• civilian-only contractors with strict health governance

• transparent procurement systems

Argument:

Because alternatives exist, reliance on military-linked firms is a choice, not a necessity.

Conclusion

Healthcare depends on trust, transparency, and non-adversarial data use, while military companies are built around secrecy, intelligence, and strategic advantage.

Combining them risks distorting healthcare priorities, weakening public trust, and enabling long-term expansion of surveillance logic into medical systems.

Bottom line

• Palantir does build AI used in war

• It also builds data systems for the NHS

The systems are purportedly separate in purpose. The controversy is really about:

• trust

• ethics

• data governance

More: How AI is being used to target Palestinians

Comments

Point Nemo: The Most Isolated Place on Earth

Imagine standing in the middle of the ocean. There is no island on the horizon. No coastline. No lighthouse. No passing fishing boat. In every direction, land is thousands of kilometres away. You are closer to the emptiness of the Pacific than to almost anywhere inhabited by humans. This place exists. It is known as Point Nemo — the oceanic pole of inaccessibility — and it lies in the remote South Pacific Ocean. But Point Nemo is more than simply a dot on a map. It is one of the strangest geographical locations on Earth, a place where isolation becomes almost absolute. And, remarkably, it has also become associated with something rather unusual: the final resting place of spacecraft. Where exactly is Point Nemo? Point Nemo lies at approximately 48°52.6′S, 123°23.6′W. According to NOAA, the nearest land is roughly 2,688 kilometres away. Three pieces of land are approximately equally distant: Ducie Island in the Pitcairn Islands, Motu Nui near Easter Island, and Maher Island off Ant...

Why Is England Still Dumping Sewage When It Isn't Raining?

If storm overflows are designed to deal with rainwater overwhelming the sewage system, why are they sometimes discharging when there has been little or no rain? In 2025, England recorded 291,492 monitored storm-overflow spill events. At first glance, that number is shocking. It works out at almost 800 recorded spill events every day of the year. Yet 2025 was an unusually dry year. In fact, the Environment Agency says the fall in sewage-spill numbers compared with 2024 was heavily influenced by those unusually dry conditions. Spill events fell by 35%, while the total duration of spills fell by 48%. So here's the obvious question: If dry weather reduces sewage spills, why are sewage overflows operating at all when it isn't raining? The answer is complicated — and potentially far more concerning than the headline numbers suggest. What is a storm overflow actually for? To understand the problem, we need to look underground. Many parts of England still have combined sewer systems. ...

Could Earth Once Have Had a Completely Different Climate?

We tend to think of Earth's climate as something relatively stable. There are warm places. Cold places. Wet places. Dry places. Ice at the poles. Deserts near the tropics. Forests covering parts of the continents. It feels permanent because human civilisation has existed for such a tiny fraction of Earth's history. But zoom out. Earth is not climatically stable at all. Over billions of years, our planet has moved between conditions that would be almost unrecognisable to us. There have been periods when ice reached surprisingly low latitudes. There have been times when Antarctica supported forests. There have been enormous changes in atmospheric composition. There have been episodes of extreme greenhouse warming. And there have been periods when much of the planet may have been covered in ice. The Earth we know today is only one possible climate state. So how different can our planet actually become? The Earth has never had just one climate Climate isn't determined by temper...

Does Wearing a Mask Affect Facial Recognition? (UK Guide, 2026)

Face masks became widespread during the COVID-19 pandemic, and many people noticed something unexpected: facial recognition systems often struggled to identify masked faces. But in 2026, things have changed. So—does wearing a mask still affect facial recognition? 👉 Short answer: Yes, masks reduce accuracy—but they no longer stop recognition reliably. This guide explains how it works, what has changed, and what to expect in real-world UK use. How Facial Recognition Works Facial recognition systems analyse key features of your face and convert them into a biometric template. These typically include • Distance between the eyes • Shape of the cheekbones • Structure of the nose • Jawline and chin • Skin texture patterns This data is then compared against databases to find a match. What Happens When You Wear a Mask? A standard face mask covers: • Nose • Mouth • Lower cheeks This removes a large portion of facial data—especially areas older systems relied on. Early Impact: Why Masks Used to ...

Could Earth Have Once Had a Ring Like Saturn?

Look at Saturn and it is difficult not to wonder what Earth would look like with rings. A vast band of ice and rock stretching across the sky. A permanent feature visible from the surface. Shadows moving across the planet as the ring system changed with the seasons. It sounds like science fiction. But Earth may actually have had something resembling a ring system in its distant past. Not necessarily a beautiful, permanent structure like Saturn's — but a temporary ring of debris could have formed around our planet after a massive collision. And the most intriguing possibility is that such an event may have played a role in creating the Moon. Earth wasn't always the quiet planet we know today The young Solar System was a chaotic place. Planets were still forming. Asteroids and planetary embryos were moving through unstable orbits, occasionally crossing paths. Collisions were not unusual. Some were relatively small. Others were catastrophic. The leading explanation for the Moon...

When Banks Become Landlords, Who Gets Left Out?

For generations, banks have made money from Britain's housing market by lending people the money to buy homes. Now something different is happening. Some banks are beginning to buy and hold residential property themselves. And that raises an uncomfortable question: What happens to house prices when the institutions that finance the housing market also start competing with the people trying to buy the houses? From financing homes to owning them The most prominent example in Britain is Lloyds Banking Group. Through its Lloyds Living operation, the banking group has built a substantial portfolio of residential properties. Its portfolio has grown to more than 7,500 homes, and in July 2026 Lloyds Living agreed a further acquisition of 980 suburban homes across 14 developments. These aren't simply properties on which Lloyds has issued mortgages. They are part of a residential investment and rental business. That distinction matters. A bank providing a mortgage helps an individual be...

Who Is Really Behind the News You See on Social Media?

Scroll through Facebook, X, TikTok or Instagram and you can encounter hundreds of accounts presenting themselves as news. Some look remarkably professional. Others appear to be little more than a logo, a dramatic headline and a constant stream of political stories. They may call themselves independent media. Alternative media. Citizen journalism. Breaking news. But who actually runs them? Who owns the website behind the Facebook page? Who registered the company? Who are its directors? Who pays for the operation? Who controls the advertising? And are several apparently independent news outlets actually connected to the same people? In an age when a social-media post can reach hundreds of thousands of people within hours, these questions have become increasingly important. And surprisingly often, the answers are publicly available. The brand may not tell you much One of the easiest mistakes to make is to treat a media brand as though it were a person. A page might have a name suggesting ...

GRB 080319B: The Explosion We Could See Across Half the Universe

On 19 March 2008, something extraordinary happened in the distant universe. A massive star died. The event produced an enormous explosion known as a gamma-ray burst, releasing an incredible amount of energy into space. But there was something particularly unusual about this one. For a brief period, the explosion was bright enough to be seen from Earth with the naked eye. The remarkable part? The explosion happened roughly 7.5 billion light-years away. By the time its light reached Earth, our planet had travelled through billions of years of cosmic history. Civilisations had risen and disappeared, continents had shifted and species had evolved — while the light from this distant catastrophe was still making its way towards us. Astronomers named it GRB 080319B. It became known as the "Naked-Eye Burst." A flash from the distant universe Gamma-ray bursts are among the most violent events known to occur in the universe. They are extraordinarily brief, but can release enormous amou...

Did Ice Age Humans Retreat Underground to Survive the Cold?

Could some of our ancestors have spent far more of the Ice Age beneath the surface than we realise? When we imagine humans during the Ice Age, we tend to picture hunters crossing frozen landscapes, wrapped in animal skins, tracking mammoths and reindeer across windswept plains. It's an image that has become almost synonymous with prehistoric humanity. But there is another possibility. When conditions became brutally cold, perhaps the smartest place to be wasn't out on the frozen landscape at all. Perhaps it was underground. Humans have been using caves and rock shelters for hundreds of thousands of years. We know that Neanderthals, Denisovans and Homo sapiens repeatedly occupied caves, sometimes during extraordinarily cold climatic periods. But this raises a more intriguing question: Did some human groups retreat into underground environments for much longer periods during the most severe phases of the Ice Age? The answer isn't as straightforward as it might first appear. W...

What If Consciousness Isn't Produced by the Brain?

You are reading these words. You can hear sounds around you. You can remember yesterday. You can imagine tomorrow. You can feel pain, recognise a face and wonder what it means to be alive. All of this feels completely ordinary. But scientifically, it is extraordinary. Somehow, electrical and chemical activity inside roughly three pounds of biological tissue is associated with the experience of being you. We know an enormous amount about the brain. We can observe neurons firing. We can map brain regions. We can measure electrical activity and watch networks communicate. We can even manipulate brain activity and change perception, memory and behaviour. And yet one enormous question remains: Why is there an experience at all? The brain clearly matters Before going further, there is an important distinction. There is overwhelming evidence that consciousness is intimately connected to the brain. Damage particular brain systems and consciousness can be profoundly altered. Anaesthesia can rev...

Blurs

Search This Blog